Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Agritourism Equine topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Clark County Ag Commission debates whether agritourism and equine operations fall under its purview
Summary
Commissioners debated whether horse boarding, riding centers and other equine operations should be represented by the Ag Advisory Commission, citing Washington's agritourism statute (RCW) and concerns that the issue could distract the commission with enforcement and permitting disputes.
Chair Joe Zimmerman raised concerns that horse owners and boarding facilities are underrepresented and suggested the Ag Commission consider advocating for equine operators. He cited state law defining agritourism activities and argued many equine uses could fall under that definition and thus the commission's scope.
Commission members split on the proposal. One commissioner warned that bringing equine issues into the commission could devolve into a long dispute over unpermitted public access to ag-exempt buildings: "If you look at the ag exemption it clearly says that it shouldn't be open to the public," a commissioner said, arguing code enforcement may treat such uses differently. Others countered that equine operations keep land in open use and can qualify under current-use or agritourism definitions. The group agreed the topic merits further conversation but cautioned against letting it distract from core agricultural priorities.
