Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Agreement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Conservation commission recommends select board authorize Sawtelle parking‑lot agreement once neighbors removed
Summary
The Brookline Conservation Commission reviewed a revised Sawtelle parking‑lot agreement, agreed the document should omit neighbor-specific language, and voted to recommend the select board authorize its chair to sign the agreement after third‑party names are removed.
Committee member (S2) moved that the commission recommend the select board authorize its chair to sign a revised Sawtelle parking‑lot agreement once the second party names have been removed; the motion was seconded and carried.
Staff member (S4) said the version circulated by email had been cleaned up to remove language concerning neighboring properties and to simplify other provisions. The group discussed notification and removal of drainage and irrigation on town property, agreeing that neighbors do not need to sign but do need to be notified. "The time frame, it's 1 year from the signing of that contract," Committee member (S2) stated when members asked about the schedule for line adjustment and infrastructure removal.
Participants debated whether to insert a fixed by‑date into the agreement or to rely on the contractor already mobilized for the parking‑lot work; several members preferred leaving the removal tied to construction mobilization rather than creating a separate deadline. The commission voted to recommend that the select board authorize the chair to sign the document after the specified parties are removed, with the expectation the select board will finalize formal signing.
The commission tasked staff to circulate the final Word version and prepare the file for select‑board action at the next meeting cycle.
