Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council approves annexation and plan amendment to allow 281‑acre mixed‑use neighborhood

NorthlakeTown Council · March 12, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Northlake approved a comprehensive‑plan amendment, annexation of 199 acres and a planned‑development zoning for a 281‑acre 4 Star master plan; council and developers said the project would preserve floodplain open space and add sewer and water capacity, while residents voiced traffic and service‑cost concerns.

The NorthlakeTown Council voted to annex about 199 acres and approved a comprehensive‑plan amendment to permit a 281‑acre mixed‑use planned development proposed by 4 Star, a national lot developer. Staff said 82 acres are already inside town limits and that the change converts a future land use designation from "industrial innovation" to "suburban neighborhood," allowing predominantly single‑family development with a maximum of three units per gross acre.

Nathan, speaking for town staff, told the council the project would preserve roughly 158 acres of open space and floodplain and build a collector road and bridge over Trail Creek. "The maximum number that the zoning allows is 845," he said, noting initial concepts were well under that cap and that the developer modeled roughly 600 rooftops in an early draft. The developer representative said the community is intended to target entry‑level buyers and that the project would bring off‑site water and a regional sewer interceptor that could expand the town's capacity.

Residents who spoke at the public hearings raised concerns about traffic, police service costs, density and the level of design detail. Joel McGregor asked whether the town would incur additional public‑safety costs and suggested the development should include concessions to offset those expenses. Rena Hardeman and another resident questioned the adequacy of the plans shown and objected to the comprehensive‑plan change without more detailed concept drawings.

Councilors and staff said the annexation and development agreement aim to give the town control over buildout and to capture growth that might otherwise be in the county. Voting on the series of actions, council approved the comprehensive plan change, annexation and the planned‑development zoning following public hearings; several council members emphasized the need for the future collector connection to FM‑1171 and for staged buildout tied to infrastructure deliveries.

The council concluded by directing staff to continue coordinating design and infrastructure sequencing; additional approvals for specific plats and infrastructure will be required before construction can begin.