Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Building Heights topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission declines roof‑height change but advances Utah Code reference update in O‑2026‑09
Summary
Kane County attorneys and commissioners debated amending commercial roof‑height rules. The commission voted unanimously not to recommend the height‑limit change but moved to recommend updating cross‑references from Utah Code Title 17, Chapter 27A to Chapter 79 for inclusion in the Land Use Ordinance.
Get email alerts on the Building Heights topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kane County Attorney Jeff Stott reviewed Ordinance O‑2026‑09 on March 11, which proposed revising the county’s commercial roof‑height rules and updating cross‑references after state code changes. Stott recommended replacing a permissive conditional‑use allowance with explicit permitted heights; he also advised consulting fire experts on ladder access and safety considerations before finalizing limits.
Commissioners debated whether to set a fixed maximum height or retain case‑by‑case conditional use review. They cited concerns about obstructing views, local tree cover and the county’s ability to defensibly deny CUPs without concrete safety reasons. Doug Heaton moved that the commission not recommend approving the height portion of the ordinance, Matt Cox seconded, and the vote was unanimous.
Following that vote, the commission considered the separate housekeeping change to update references to Utah Code Title 17 from Chapter 27A to Chapter 79 within chapter 1 of the Kane County Land Use Ordinance. Matt Cox moved to recommend that amendment to the Kane County Commission; Julie Millard seconded. The transcript records the motion and second for the code‑reference update but does not record a roll‑call vote in the provided excerpts.
