Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident urges council to re-send Hunter's Path plans; city manager pledges full technical packet
Summary
A resident asked council to reconsider bringing Hunter's Path Phase 4 back to planning commission and said website links did not provide the plans; City Manager Elaine Whitman said staff will provide the missing traffic, grading and stormwater plans (over 500 pages) via a drop box and confirmed technical reviews will proceed before approvals.
A resident urged the council to reconsider the timing and transparency of the Hunter's Path Phase 4 final development plan.
Joe Sider (5902 Mount Royal Drive) told council the planning commission had deadlocked 2–2 on the final plan and asked that staff "reconsider and have another planning commission meeting and follow the processes that you have in place." He also said the online links to plans were not working and asked for clearer information about how long a broken-down vehicle may remain on the street before towing.
City Manager Elaine Whitman replied that the planning commission is an advisory body and council may act, but she emphasized that all technical reviews — construction, engineering and Ohio EPA reviews — will still be completed. Whitman said staff identified missing technical submittals that had not accompanied the final plan (grading, stormwater detention and the traffic analysis) and that those materials will be provided to council in the next meeting packet via a drop box because they total more than 500 pages. She apologized to council for not notifying them before public notices were sent and said she would do better in the future.
Chief Nabel clarified parking enforcement for disabled vehicles and recreational vehicles, saying disabled vehicles are addressed under section 303.08 and that recreational vehicles have a 12-hour allowance in a 24-hour period under the oversized-vehicle provision. Whitman and staff confirmed there would be no process "shortcuts" for required technical reviews before moving to infrastructure and construction phases.
