Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council tables Mockingbird Lane phase 1 paving after questions about developer tie‑ins

City of Midland City Council · June 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council discussed awarding a $1.18 million contract for Mockingbird Lane phase 1 but tabled the item after council members asked staff to pursue developer contributions for tie‑in work and to review use of remaining road bond funds.

Council members on Tuesday deferred consideration of a $1,177,016.31 contract award for the Mockingbird Lane Phase 1 paving and drainage project in order to get more information about developer responsibilities and the remaining road bond balance.

City staff described the scope as a short section of Mockingbird east of Fairgrounds Road intended to improve connectivity and safety for nearby neighborhoods. A staff presentation said the low bid was about $500,000 under estimate and that the project would take roughly three months. "This will simply improve connectivity to existing neighborhoods," the presenter said during the briefing.

Council members pressed staff about whether private developers should share the cost of curb and gutter tie‑ins. One councilmember said they wanted to "expedite this as quickly as possible" for residents, but also protect taxpayers and ask developers to contribute to the tie‑in work. Public commenter Judd Campbell asked whether the funding was coming from the city's road bond; staff replied there are only a very small amount of bond funds and interest left and that the project was being considered to use remaining bond proceeds so the city avoids arbitrage issues.

After discussion Councilmember Holder moved to table the project until the next meeting to allow time to pursue those conversations; the council voted to defer the item unanimously. The council said staff should return with more information on developer participation and a clear accounting of available bond funds.