Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Accountability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Crowley ISD lays out Vision 2030 goals, gap maps and testing timeline in data workshop
Summary
District academic leaders presented Vision 2030 targets and spring benchmark results: 3rd-grade reading 'meets' at ~32% with a target of 44%, and the district said it would need about 94 additional 3rd-graders meeting 'meets' to hit the goal; administrators described gap maps, intervention strategies, and testing dates.
District leaders presented a data workshop they described as "mission control" for Vision 2030, explaining three lenses for tracking progress (apples-to-apples, oranges-to-apples, and acorns-to-oak) and walking trustees through literacy and numeracy goals and campus-level gap maps.
Dr. Rowe and the presentation team described benchmarks taken in February/early March and showed that 3rd grade reading stood at roughly 32% meeting standard at the spring benchmark, with a Vision 2030 target of 44% to match the top-performing peer districts. Presenters explained that closing that gap would require 94 additional 3rd-graders meeting the 'meets' standard districtwide — an average of about six students per elementary campus "to hit that goal," according to the presentation.
Trustees asked how the district will reach those students and presenters described targeted interventions: campus-level gap maps, student-specific interventions, district supports, curriculum alignment, extended learning (additional days), professional coaching and data-driven instruction. Presenters also said the district will push assessment and intervention reports to families through ParentSquare and emphasized teacher and principal engagement around data meetings.
Testing timelines were reviewed: state STAAR end-of-course testing and grades 3–8 testing begin in April; end-of-year assessments occur in May; individual student results are expected in June with preliminary district accountability in August. The board then divided into subject breakout sessions to review grade-level and content-level data in about 15-minute rotations.
No formal policy or budget decision was taken in this session; the item was presented as a workshop to inform trustees and prepare for deeper campus/district conversations.
