Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Site Plan Engineering topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Engineers: Meadowridge site plan lacks utility acceptance, erosion controls and detailed sound-wall specs
Summary
OHM’s engineering review found the 400 Meadowridge Drive site plan incomplete: the existing 8-inch water main and sanitary pump station were shown but never accepted into the city system, stormwater treatment units were missing, wetland mapping conflicted, and 14-foot sound wall details were omitted — the plan was not recommended for approval.
Get email alerts on the Site Plan Engineering topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
OHM Advisors’ lead engineer told the Planning Commission the site plan submitted for 400 Meadowridge Drive “is not in substantial compliance with City of Fenton requirements, and we do not recommend approval at this time,” citing multiple technical deficiencies.
Tim Judici’s review identified specific tasks the applicant must complete before resubmittal: verify and commission the existing 8-inch water main (clean, flush, poly-pig, pressure and bacteria testing), record a 12-foot public water main easement to the City, verify and test the existing sanitary sewer, pump station and force main (including videotaping and pressure testing), provide stormwater treatment units to meet City standards and obtain Genesee County Drain Commission permits for a detention-basin outlet to the Adams Drain. The engineer also asked for updated wetland mapping, inclusion of City of Fenton General Notes and Standard Construction Details, a soil erosion and sediment control plan, and full details for the proposed 14-foot sound wall including materials and footings.
The review flagged operational and safety items on the plan set: missing utility phase timing for the two-phase project, an unlabeled engineered washout area, absent wheel-wash/dust-control for truck access, and a proposed temporary concrete plant in Phase I with no utility service details. The engineering office listed an 18-point set of corrections and required submissions before the City would accept the plan for approval.
