Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Overcapacity Metrics topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee reviews two metrics that would trigger an 'overcapacity' finding

Orleans Parish School Board Policy Committee · July 29, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The proposed Policy HG defines two alternate metrics that would place the district in a state of overcapacity: (1) a school-level fill-rate test (fewer than 75% of schools meeting 91% of optimal enrollment) and (2) a campus-efficient enrollment test (50% or fewer of campuses at ~675 students).

At the policy committee meeting, presenters explained the two alternate metrics the administration would use to determine whether Orleans Parish is in a state of overcapacity.

First, the school-level fill-rate test measures the share of schools (K–8 and 9–12 separately) that meet 91% or more of their school-specific "optimal enrollment." The draft would treat fewer than 75% of schools meeting that threshold as an indicator of system overcapacity. Lagana said the shift to a school-level measure was intended to avoid masking under-enrolled schools within an overall system average.

Second, the campus-efficient enrollment test is a size-based threshold intended to capture whether typical campuses are large enough to be financially and programmatically sustainable. The draft sets a benchmark of roughly 675 students (about three sections per grade with 25–30 students per class) and says that if 50% or fewer of a grade-span's campuses meet that size threshold, the district could be in overcapacity.

Lagana emphasized that "optimal enrollment" will be set in annual meetings between NOLA-PS staff and schools and revisited each year, and that alternative school models and some small intentionally small schools would be considered within the process. Board members asked for simulations and past-year runs to see how these metrics would have applied historically; staff said they have run simulations using prior years' 10/1 counts and would share more detail.