Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parking Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board to review ordinance making top two levels of Exchange Street garage free to encourage employee parking
Summary
Deputy City Manager Lance Speitzer presented ordinance O 26 29 to make Levels 3A and 3B of the Exchange Street parking plaza free, citing occupancy data showing underuse of those open-air levels and asking staff to target communication and signage to downtown employees; board members asked for revenue-impact figures and details on enforcement hours and overnight restrictions.
Get email alerts on the Parking Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Deputy City Manager Lance Speitzer presented ordinance O 26 29 to convert the top two open-air levels of the Exchange Street parking garage (Levels 3A and 3B) from paid secondary parking to free parking, with the stated intent of providing a benefit to downtown employees and increasing efficient use of the facility.
"The main point of this particular ordinance is to have those top 2 levels... be free from payment, but to really try to push that toward employees and to provide that benefit to them," Speitzer said. Staff noted occupancy sensors show 50–60% occupancy even on busy weekends and reported about 250–255 total spaces in the garage.
Directors asked for revenue-impact reporting; Director Webb requested that staff include revenue figures for the Exchange Street deck in the packet. Board members also asked how the city would communicate the change; staff said signage inside the facility would indicate free parking on Levels 3A and 3B and that the downtown rate-zone map on the city website would be updated. Enforcement hours and access questions were clarified: the paid enforcement window is counted from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m., and the entrance gate is closed from about 10 p.m. to 6 a.m., although vehicles already inside can remain overnight; staff said the elevator and restrooms are locked at 10 p.m.
The proposal was presented for review ahead of formal consideration on Aug. 4; board members voiced operational questions about potential spillover and communications but recorded no formal objection at the review meeting.

