Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
ADR discusses code clarifications: decks in setbacks, retaining walls, trellises and pool review thresholds
Summary
Members hashed out draft code language and administrative policy: decks in a 10-foot setback should not exceed 18 inches in height, certain features may rise to 4 feet, retaining walls over 48 inches would trigger design review, and trellises should be treated as structures unless limited by existing landscape definitions.
Committee members spent a substantive portion of the meeting clarifying how proposed landscape exceptions and expedited review thresholds would operate in practice.
Members noted the draft language limiting decks in the 10-foot setback to 18 inches: "So it can't be higher than 18 inches," one member said, while adding that other features such as fireplaces or seat walls could rise "up to 4 feet." The ADR discussed whether a 48-inch (4-foot) retaining wall plus a 42-inch railing on top could create effectively an 8-foot vertical mass and whether such combinations should require design review. Staff explained that the 48‑inch threshold would be a trigger for design review and that an open railing might not be counted toward wall height in the same way as a solid parapet.
Members also flagged trellises as a use case that frequently blurs the line between a small landscape feature and a structure; the committee recommended that larger or roofed trellises be considered structures subject to standard setbacks and design review. One member cited a municipal citation number while discussing definitions: "18.12 0.194," and staff said they would align the draft language with the town's existing minor-exception practice for pool equipment and setbacks.
Staff will draft a revised ordinance or administrative guideline incorporating these clarifications and circulate it to ADR members and the town attorney for review before the item goes to council.
