Get email alerts on the Data Tools topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
New tools guide states to align workforce data sources with evaluation questions
Summary
PHI and Institute on Community Integration presenters walked through practical tools to identify partners, document administrative and data characteristics of sources, score alignment on coverage/content/quality/timeliness, and prioritize gaps for action.
Stephen McCall of PHI and Julie Bershadski of the Institute on Community Integration described complementary tools designed to help state teams strengthen workforce data systems and align data sources to evaluation questions. McCall said the first tool encourages teams to brainstorm partners, identify each partner’s value proposition and determine how partners should engage (advisory, work group, project team). “The first is to identify and engage partners,” McCall said, emphasizing partner roles in data collection and reporting.
Bershadski walked through a tool for documenting data-source administrative details (owners, stewardship, statutory basis), population coverage (programs, settings, worker types), workforce elements (size, compensation, credentials), data characteristics (unit of analysis, frequency, recency) and data quality. She recommended scoring each source for coverage, content, quality and timeliness, documenting gaps and prioritizing fixes based on impact and feasibility.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
