Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facility Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District attorney proposes vaping ban in county buildings; court requests policy draft
Summary
The district attorney asked the court to prohibit vaping in county buildings and to bar persons subject to search from possessing vaping materials to reduce safety risks and courtroom disturbances; commissioners asked staff to draft formal policy language and to return it to court.
John Blades from the district attorney’s office presented a two‑part proposal: ban vaping inside county buildings and prohibit persons subject to search from possessing vaping materials (including cartridges) in county facilities. He cited recent incidents when a juror's family member vaped in a courtroom and concerns about unknown aerosol contents (THC, pepper spray or other hazardous materials) in cartridges.
Commissioners discussed whether the policy should apply to all county buildings or be limited to the courthouse and other secure facilities. Some supported a broad ban; others were concerned about enforcement at fairgrounds and other venues where smoking or similar activities are historically permitted. Several commissioners said they were prepared to support a temporary policy for the courthouse; others asked staff to draft a final policy that clarifies scope, enforcement (sheriff's deputies), and exemptions for employees not subject to search. The court did not adopt a final policy at the meeting but directed staff to draft language for a future vote.
