Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board deadlock ends effort to move into executive session; trustees clash over outside counsel
Summary
Trustees clashed over admitting outside counsel paid by insurance and whether to enter executive session on the independent investigative report. A roll-call vote approved allowing outside counsel to join (5–4), but the chair recorded that the board could not enter executive session because of trustee objections.
A dispute over who may be present in executive session created an impasse on July 30 when some trustees sought to include outside counsel (John Mackey), whose involvement is funded through insurance for certain trustees, and others objected. Chair Kahele declined the request; trustees advocating to include the attorney argued it would aid communication. The board held a roll-call vote on the admittance of the outside counsel and recorded 5 yes votes and 4 no votes.
After the vote the chair stated on the record that "this board of trustees has not been able to go into executive session because we have been obstructed by 4 trustees who have denied the opportunity for us to have sensitive, privileged conversations." The disagreement meant the board continued related legal and investigative discussion in public session and later addressed nonprivileged items instead. Trustees raised concerns about Sunshine Law compliance, insurance-paid counsel availability, and the need to preserve privileged attorney-client discussions if an executive session were held.
