Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Boundary Adjustment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wheeler boundary line adjustment filed; applicant says no new lot or development planned
Summary
At the Fayston Development Review Board meeting on June 2, the Wheelers’ application for a boundary line adjustment was accepted as complete; the applicant's representative said no new lot will be created and there is no intent to develop. The board closed the hearing and moved to deliberation.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Boundary Adjustment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At the Town of Fayston Development Review Board meeting on June 2, 2026, the board heard Application #4019 from parties represented by Sheila Getzinger seeking a boundary line adjustment involving the Wheelers' properties.
"This is a boundary line adjustment; no new lot will be created," Sheila Getzinger said, adding that "There is no intent for development." She said the Wheelers are buying adjacent property and plan to attach it to their existing land rather than create a separate parcel.
Board member Beth Eisenhower suggested adding abutters’ names to any revised map to improve clarity; Getzinger replied that adding those names could be costly, particularly where no surveys exist. When Eisenhower asked whether the property could be considered a separate lot, a participant identified as Jason said Sheila would draft legal language clarifying that the acquired parcel will merge with the Wheelers' existing lot.
Board member Ky Koitsch questioned whether the entire adjusted lot should be reflected on the mylar (official map). Getzinger responded that, because no new lot is being created, a separate survey or separate map depicting a new lot is not legally required.
The board previously moved to find the application complete (motion by Jim Donkersloot; second by Beth Eisenhower), and after the presentation the board voted to close the hearing (motion by Beth Eisenhower; second by Jim Donkersloot). The board then moved into deliberation at 6:29 p.m.; the minutes do not record a final decision on the application in the provided transcript.
Next steps: the minutes show the board entered deliberation but do not record any final action or a future date for a decision in the supplied transcript.
