Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Amendments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board adopts 21 zoning text amendments in single hearing; many changes driven by state law
Summary
In a single public hearing the board adopted 21 text amendments to the county zoning ordinance — including state‑driven changes (forest conservation), local policy edits (retail accessory use, sign rules, ADU parking waivers), and multiple operational clarifications. The board closed the record and set the amendments to take effect 10 days after adoption.
The Calvert County Board of County Commissioners adopted a package of 21 zoning text amendments after a public hearing that covered changes required by state law and county‑led clarifications.
Planning Director Jason Brinkley and staff walked the board through each amendment (26‑01 through 26‑24). Several amendments were framed as responses to state mandates (notably the forest conservation changes) while others were local policy adjustments intended to streamline review, support small businesses, or clarify definitions.
Key local changes included: clarifying that county‑owned and board of education properties are exempt from zoning where state or federal law does not require compliance (26‑02); adding a retail‑accessory use to allow incidental sales in light industrial and mixed‑use districts (26‑05); aligning accessory dwelling parking rules with HB 1466 and adding an on‑street parking exception (26‑04); revisions to sign and electronic message center measurements (26‑08); and reinstating or adjusting various setback, buffer, and sizing rules across town centers and special districts (26‑11, 26‑12, 26‑13, 26‑18).
Several amendments drew technical questions from commissioners about practical effects: whether reforestation must occur near cleared sites (staff: mitigation begins on‑site, then within watershed, and must remain in the county); whether sidewalk or site‑plan triggers tied to state stormwater thresholds could still require engineering reviews (staff noted the state stormwater trigger remains binding); and whether some changes would require future DNR sign‑off if the county sought deviations from the state model language.
The board also amended one proposal during the hearing: staff’s suggested 5,000‑square‑foot threshold for requiring a Category 2 site plan for farm agritourism (26‑21) was amended to 10,000 square feet “unless directed otherwise by the Department of Planning and Zoning.” Another amendment (26‑14), which would have changed how garage conversions count toward accessory structure size, was rejected after members expressed housing‑supply concerns.
All adopted amendments were closed for public comment at the meeting; staff said adopted changes become effective 10 days after adoption and will be followed administratively. The board approved the consent agenda and later voted to close the record for the text amendments.
