Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Telecommunications Tower topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tinmouth opposes proposed radio tower; board ratifies filings against Certificate of Public Good
Summary
Selectboard members and residents told legislators and staff the proposed radio tower conflicts with Tinmouth’s town plan and local telecommunications rules; the board ratified letters opposing the tower’s Certificate of Public Good filing and encouraged public comment on the PUC docket.
Tinmouth Selectboard members reported that a telecommunications company filed for a Certificate of Public Good (CPG) for a proposed radio tower on Route 140, and the town has formally objected because the proposal does not comply with the local town plan or telecommunications regulations.
A resident recommended that siting for tall towers revert to Act 250‑type review and said the Public Utility Commission’s expanded role raised concerns about land‑use decisions: “I just wanted to express was concern about the public utility commission, making land use decisions on where towers can go,” a resident said.
Board members described the advanced‑notice responses and the town’s planning commission determination that the proposal does not meet the town plan. The company filed a petition in August, which triggered more complex intervention procedures; one official warned that legal and consultant costs to intervene could be substantial for the town.
Action taken: the board ratified the letters filed on September 9 objecting to the tower and encouraged residents to submit comments to the PUC docket. The board also discussed technical compatibility concerns—local emergency services reported the company’s proposed system is not compatible with existing fire department communications.
