Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the County Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Brooks County Commissioners' Court tables 911 subsidy increase, finds misposted CDs during budget review
Summary
At a May 15 special term, the Brooks County Commissioners' Court tabled a proposed increase to the City of Falfurrias 911 subsidy, reviewed 2024–25 budget figures (reporting $781,452 cash on hand and a $500,000 CD), found two certificates of deposit misposted from Road and Bridge to the General Fund, and held an executive session on personnel that produced no formal actions.
Get email alerts on the County Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Brooks County Judge Eric Ramos opened a special term of the Commissioners' Court on May 15, 2025, at 9:02 a.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance. The court considered a variety of items, including a proposed increase to the City of Falfurrias' 911 subsidy, a review of county revenue and expenditures for fiscal year 2024–25, and personnel matters discussed in executive session.
During a budget review, Judge Ramos said the county currently had $781,452 cash on hand and a certificate of deposit of $500,000. Staff preparing for the annual audit discovered that two certificates of deposit — $250,000 and $225,000 — previously recorded to the Road and Bridge fund had been entered into the General Fund. Ramos said that with restrained monthly spending (the court reviewed an approximate 8% monthly spending rate) and a few adjustments, the county should remain in the black by the end of the budget year.
On a separate agenda item, Katy Salinas in human resources noted that a line in the 911 budget that pays for supplies may need to be separated for 911 addressing vs. indigent services. Commissioners discussed raising the subsidy (a figure of $10,000 had been discussed at a prior meeting) but ultimately agreed to table the proposal. Commissioner Aaron Trevino moved to table the item; Commissioner Nora Salinas seconded and the motion passed by unanimous roll-call vote.
The court recessed into an executive session at 9:34 a.m. to discuss personnel matters and returned to open session at 10:35 a.m. No personnel actions were taken under the employment items listed on the agenda. The special term was adjourned following a unanimous motion to adjourn.
