Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Police Headquarters topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves feasibility, environmental and outreach contracts for potential Civic Center police headquarters amid strong public opposition
Summary
After hours of public comment opposing a police headquarters in Civic Center Park, Newport Beach City Council approved three consultant contracts to study conceptual designs, do environmental surveys and handle outreach — votes were split on the communications contract.
The Newport Beach City Council voted to authorize three consultant agreements to advance preliminary work on a potential police headquarters on the Civic Center campus, despite repeated public objections that the park is unsuitable for the project.
Residents questioned the site’s green‑belt status, underground water constraints, traffic impacts and the expense of further studies. "I am appalled to have learned that it is your intent to move this Newport Beach Police Department to the Bunny Park," said Madeline Enright during public comment, urging the council to reconsider the location.
City staff described the package as phased, limited expenditures to test feasibility. City manager staff said the architectural firm would perform conceptual site design (phase 1, not the full $12.4 million design package) and that LSA and other consultants would conduct focused biological surveys and a subsequent environmental review. "We're approving phase 1," a staff presenter said, emphasizing that conceptual design work is capped and that detailed environmental study is required to determine feasibility.
Council members debated sequencing and fiscal prudence. Council member Grant said the studies are necessary but cautioned staff to return with funding plans; Council member Stapleton said the contracts are premature without a clear funding strategy. The motions to approve the conceptual design contract (item 18) and the environmental services amendment (item 19) passed 6–1. A motion to approve an outreach and public‑relations contract (item 20) passed 5–2, with Council members Grant and Stapleton opposed because they described the PR contract as premature.
The council’s action authorizes limited consultant work to evaluate the Civic Center site’s suitability and to prepare environmental documents if warranted. Opponents asked the council to slow down, hold town halls, and make all project assumptions transparent before proceeding. The council directed staff to continue studies and return with findings; no final site selection or construction authorization was made.
