Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rhid topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Brown County commissioners press city on RHID timeline, 25‑year term and contract details
Summary
County commissioners asked detailed questions about a city‑backed RHID housing proposal — raising concerns about a 30‑day decision window, a 25‑year tax‑increment term, unclear eligible RHID costs and an August 3 construction‑start deadline. The city asked the commission to submit written questions for a follow‑up meeting.
Commissioners of the Brown County Commission pressed city officials for more information about a proposed RHID (rural housing incentive district) project, saying the county received the package with only a 30‑day decision window and “felt like this is given to us now with a 30 day time period,” a commissioner (S4) said.
The commissioner said residents have called with concerns about the 25‑year term and how RHID revenues would be calculated over time. “Why is it 25 years?” the commissioner asked, noting that local residents expected shorter commitments like 10 or 15 years. County members also asked whether the RHID cap would stop once the developer’s requested amount is met or continue to collect taxes as property values rise.
City official (S3) described the RHID as part of the developer’s financing plan and said the city negotiated to reduce municipal risk. “The RHID is very important for the funding of the project,” S3 said, adding that certain costs must be certified to the state under Kansas law and that the state would ultimately certify eligible reimbursements.
Commissioners pressed for contract clarifications about which infrastructure the city would supply and whether ownership of lots could transfer to the developer before construction milestones are met. One commissioner asked for clearer definitions of line items such as “general conditions,” “contingency” and the scope of “necessary infrastructure” in the draft contract.
Given the number of open questions, commissioners agreed to gather written questions and send them to city staff for formal responses. The city offered to return to a future county meeting to answer questions in person; commissioners said they would prepare a consolidated list and email it to the city. No formal county vote on RHID participation occurred at the meeting.
Next steps: county commissioners will submit written questions to city staff for response; the county may schedule a follow‑up discussion at a future commission meeting.
