Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks Fireworks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
South Ogden keeps parks fireworks policy unchanged for now, directs staff to consult insurers and neighboring cities
Summary
Council discussed recurring private fireworks events in parks, liability and permitting; staff will consult the City's trust and Layton and return with recommendations. For an upcoming event, council kept the status quo so planners can proceed while the policy review continues.
Get email alerts on the Parks Fireworks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The South Ogden City Council spent the largest portion of its June 3 meeting debating whether to change city policy on private events and the use of parks for fireworks.
Staff member Danielle (addressed in the meeting as "Danielle") told the council the city's insurance trust had recommended the city have lawyers draft a formal agreement and spelled out insurance and certificate-of-insurance requirements for any permitted fireworks shows. "The trust's recommendation was here's a list of things that should go into a legal document that you should have the city attorney put together," Danielle said, underscoring the indemnity and permitting issues the city would need to resolve before authorizing professional or large-scale displays.
Council members debated three core issues: whether consumer fireworks, allowed by Utah law during state windows, should be treated differently from professional pyrotechnic displays that use larger shells and require special spacing and permits; whether the city should require a permit or Bowery rental to help capture organizer contact information; and the liability exposure if the city were to sanction large events.
Several council members argued for a hands-off approach while laws and enforcement mechanisms already exist at the state and county level. "It's a public park, and people are allowed to do lawful things in a public park," a council member said, noting that illegal mortars already fall under state code and can be enforced by officers. Other members urged caution, noting neighborhood impacts, growing scale of the events and requests from out-of-county organizers.
Because organizers have requested shows that fall close to July, council directed staff to consult with the City Trust and with officials in Layton to learn why that city recently tightened rules. The council's working direction was to leave the status quo in place for now so an event planned for late July could proceed, while staff prepares a recommendation on formal policy, permit language and insurance requirements for larger or out-of-window shows. "Let them move forward and we'll revisit this," Mr. Dixon said during the discussion, urging staff to bring back options and any guidance from neighboring cities and the trust.
Next steps: staff will obtain the Trust's written guidance on insurance thresholds, contact the state fire marshal for pyrotechnic requirements and report back to the council at a future meeting with a draft policy and recommended permit conditions.
