Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procedural topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission member corrects prior vote interpretation; briefing ends, regular meeting set for 6:30 p.m.
Summary
A commission member clarified that a 4–3 vote at the prior meeting was recorded correctly and that a majority of those voting is required for the commission to forward recommendations; the staff briefing concluded at 5:51 p.m. and the regular meeting was set to reconvene at 6:30 p.m., with Item 2 re‑noticed for March 24.
Get email alerts on the Procedural topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A commission member opened the briefing's substantive procedural discussion by apologizing for creating confusion at the prior meeting and correcting how the earlier vote was recorded. The member said the prior item had a 4–3 vote and clarified that for the Planning and Zoning Commission an action requires a majority of those voting — in the current five‑member attendance that would be three votes. "At the last meeting, I caused some confusion about, whether was gonna go forward with a recommendation or not. I was incorrect," the commission member said.
Chair Cheryl Smith and other commissioners acknowledged the clarification and proceeded to staff presentations. At the end of the briefing the commission noted Item 2 was re‑noticed and scheduled to return on March 24; the briefing adjourned at 5:51 p.m. and the body planned to reconvene for the regular meeting at approximately 6:30 p.m.
