Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Group Homes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council denies specific-use permit for group home at 2772 Pleasant Hill Road after extended public comment
Summary
After lengthy public comment and council questions about neighborhood notification and emergency-service calls, the council voted to deny a specific-use permit for a group home at 2772 Pleasant Hill Road and gave the current occupant 60 days to relocate.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Group Homes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The council voted to deny a specific-use permit for a proposed registered group home at 2772 Pleasant Hill Road after an extended public-comment period in which neighbors raised concerns about notice, neighborhood impacts and emergency-service calls.
Staff said the SUP requirement was triggered because the site is within 2,500 feet of an existing registered group home. The applicant's operator said the facility currently houses three seniors (including a veteran), described the operator as "hands on" and said they began the state licensing process after staff advised them. Planning and Zoning had recommended denial by a 4–3 vote; the development review committee recommended approval with conditions including a three-client cap.
Multiple neighbors said they were not told in advance and described frequent public-service responses to the property; one neighbor said he recorded eight public-service calls in the past year and questioned whether the reported three medical calls in staff records reflected the full operational impact. The homeowner who owns multiple nearby properties said his properties are inspected and maintained, and speakers debated whether the city was being fair if other similar homes in the area had not been held to the same standard.
Given concerns about neighborhood notification and the owner's broader portfolio, Council member Lopez moved to deny Item 23 and to allow the current occupants at least 60 days to relocate; the motion carried. Council members and staff discussed verifying whether other similar properties in the area held required permits, but staff said distance checks and registration verification would take additional time and could not be completed immediately during the meeting.
The denial was framed as driven by process and neighborhood-notice concerns rather than an assertion that the operator provided poor care; council asked staff to follow up to determine whether other nearby group homes are properly registered and permitted.
