Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning 1610 Walnut topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission denies rezoning for proposed Walnut Street warehouse after residents object
Summary
The Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously March 10 to deny a comprehensive-plan amendment and zoning change for a proposed 166,000-sq-ft warehouse at 1610 Walnut Street after dozens of residents raised traffic, noise and health concerns.
The City of Grand Prairie Planning and Zoning Commission on March 10 recommended denying a comprehensive-plan amendment and a zoning change that would have allowed a 166,000-square-foot light-industrial building at 1610 Walnut Street.
After a staff presentation and a developer pitch, commissioners moved to close the public hearing and deny both items. Commissioner Janie Mendez Adakari made the motion to deny; Commissioner Angela Lucky Vaughn seconded it. Chair Cheryl Smith announced the denial after commissioners voted unanimously.
Residents turned out in force to oppose the proposal, arguing the site is better suited for housing and neighborhood retail. Eric Smith, who lives at 1405 East Tarrant, told the commission the neighborhood is "aging" and needs population and grocery access, not warehouses. Vanessa George, a nurse who said she works in pulmonary research, warned about pollution and health impacts: "Pollution is a big problem…what are we doing to combat that?" Several speakers said narrow local streets and existing truck traffic mean heavy truck use would worsen road conditions and safety.
Staff had told commissioners the Development Review Committee could not support the zoning change as proposed because it did not align with the future land-use map, but listed conditions (additional screening and a PHEQ-approved noise study) that could be required if the commission recommended approval. Developer Tyler Thomas said the proposal would be "sunken" below street elevation, include extensive landscaping, exclude 56 disruptive uses and target local light-industrial tenants. He argued the planned design and buffer would minimize visibility and impact.
Commissioners said the lack of early neighborhood outreach and residents' consistent concerns weighed heavily. With no amendment to bring the project into alignment with the future land-use map, the commission chose to recommend denial; the matter will next be considered by city council in its advisory capacity but the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation is recorded for council consideration.
