Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Drainage Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Traill County water board holds public hearing on Roseville Drain No. 19 improvement project

Traill County Water Resource District · March 31, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its March 31 meeting in Hillsboro, the Traill County Water Resource District held a public hearing on the Roseville Drain No. 19 Improvement Project (No. 2026-01); the board discussed outlet liability and the landowner voting process, with no vote recorded in the transcript.

On March 31, 2026, the Traill County Water Resource District met in Hillsboro and held a public hearing on the Roseville Drain No. 19 Improvement Project (Project No. 2026-01). Chairman Jason Siegert presided; board engineers Nathan Trosen and Andrew Smith and the board’s attorney, Sean Fredricks, were present along with several landowners.

Nathan Trosen, listed as one of the board’s engineers, reviewed the proposed improvement and outlined how the voting process would work for landowners. The transcript records: "Nathan Trosen reviewed the Proposed Improvement Project, and voting process." Board members and attendees then discussed potential aspects of the drain improvement, focusing on outlet liability and how landowner votes would be conducted and counted. The record notes these topics were discussed but does not include a formal motion text or a roll-call vote relating to the project.

The meeting roster in the record names Chairman Jason Siegert and Water Managers Joel Halvorson, Jason Lovas, Andy Neset and Gary Thompson as present; it also lists landowners in attendance by name. The hearing, as recorded, served to inform landowners about the proposal and to collect discussion and questions about liability and procedure rather than to finalize a board decision.

The transcript does not identify a formal vote on Project No. 2026-01 or any motion outcome. Any future action—such as a recorded vote or a formal assessment—was not reflected in the minutes provided.