Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Proposal for gravel path to pond prompts questions about community vetting process
Summary
Council asked staff to research costs for a proposed gravel path to the pond. During Q&A a resident raised whether Policy 500 applies; a council member responded that Policy 500 is intended for resident-proposed amenities and that the council must still discuss and vote publicly and, where applicable, coordinate with Ada County on conservation-easement overlays.
The Town Council discussed a proposal to install a gravel pathway to the pond with a bench and trash can and asked Operations Manager Casey Baker to research the cost. Council characterized the item as under consideration and not yet championed by a resident advocate, which prompted questions about procedural review.
During the meeting Q&A, a resident identified as Joan asked whether Policy 500 — a mechanism for resident-advocate proposals and a 30-day public comment period — applied to the council-led pathway proposal. A council member responded that Policy 500 is designed for resident-proposed amenities, that the elected council may propose projects but that "it has to be discussed publicly and has to be voted on publicly," and noted Ada County's conservation easement overlay may require county involvement. The minutes record follow-up: staff will research costs and outreach practices will continue.
