Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Selection topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ottawa County commissioners select Patrick Waterman and authorize contract negotiations after 7-4 vote
Summary
Following public comment and internal discussion, the Ottawa County Board of Commissioners selected Patrick Waterman as the administrator candidate by internal ballot and voted 7–4 to authorize the chair to begin contract negotiations.
Get email alerts on the Personnel Selection topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Ottawa County Board of Commissioners on Sept. 12 selected Patrick Waterman as the county's administrator candidate and authorized the chair to begin contract negotiations after a roll-call vote that passed 7'to'4.
The selection process began when the board voted to have each commissioner identify one candidate by ballot. The clerk read the ballots aloud and announced that a majority of the votes went to Patrick Waterman. Chair (presiding official) then moved to authorize negotiations; the roll call recorded seven "yes" votes and four "no" votes. The clerk read the roll-call result and the chair said, "Congratulations to Patrick Waterman." (Clerk; Chair).
Board members who spoke during the selection described different priorities. Several commissioners emphasized staff input and administrative experience; one commissioner, noting the county serves "300,000 plus residents," asked the board to prioritize a leader who could "hit the ground running." (Joe Busch, Water Resources Commissioner). Another commissioner said earlier interviews and citizen work-group notes favored candidates with larger-government experience.
The vote to authorize negotiations requires the chair to begin contract talks and return a proposed employment contract to the full board for approval. The roll-call sequence recorded the following pattern: four commissioners voted "no" and seven voted "yes." The board did not finalize a signed contract at the meeting; the chair was authorized only to start negotiations and report back.
What happens next: the chair will negotiate terms with Waterman and present a contract to the board for formal approval; no effective date or salary terms were provided during the meeting.
