Get email alerts on the Printing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff warn PDF output renumbers items after moving to 'Local and Private'
Summary
During the demo staff moved a Senate bill into the Local and Private subcalendar and observed that the printed PDF renumbered items instead of preserving consecutive calendar numbering. They requested that printed calendars retain sequential numbering (1, 2, 3) for floor and public distribution.
During the demo Presenter moved a bill to the Local and Private subcalendar and printed the calendar; staff noted the PDF output renumbered items instead of keeping consecutive numbering across subcalendars. Presenter acknowledged the behaviour and staff stressed the need for predictable numbering: "It should be 1, 2, 3," they said while reviewing the printed PDF.
Staff explained renumbering creates confusion on the floor and asked that the team fix the print and export logic so documents intended for floor use retain consistent, consecutive numbering across selected subcalendars.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
