Get email alerts on the Sloopy Project topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press for clarity after OPSB staff report on Sloopy Project
Summary
Residents asked Clark County commissioners for updates on the Sloopy Project; commissioners said the Ohio Power Siting Board staff report did not recommend approval and that evidentiary hearings are the next step where the county will present evidence.
Mary Adkins of Springfield Township asked the Board of Clark County Commissioners whether the Sloopy Project was moving forward and what the countys position might be. Commissioner Sasha L. Rittenhouse said she had read the Ohio Power Siting Board staff report and "the project was not recommended for approval," and that the report contained 64 conditions the staff suggested should be met.
Beau Thompson, Clark Countys chief legal counsel, described the administrative process: during upcoming evidentiary hearings, "all the intervening parties, the county included, will be there every day presenting evidence to the OPSB," and judges will consider the open forum transcript and written comments already on the docket. Residents asked who would present evidence about native burial grounds and the Ohio Department of Natural Resourcess (ODNR) findings; Thompson said the OPSB staff has analyzed historical- and environmental-related materials and that the administrative law judges will rule on admissibility of evidence. The commissioners encouraged residents to review the staff report, which is posted online.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
