Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Coaches Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates annual reapplication for coaches; members split on evaluation versus rehiring requirement
Summary
Director Neal Bond proposed a policy requiring coaches to apply each year; board members favored a robust annual evaluation process instead, raising concerns about bargaining, conflicts of interest for athletic directors, and potential hiring barriers. Staff to return refined evaluation language.
Director Neal Bond introduced a proposed policy on the hiring and evaluation of coaches that would require coaches to apply each year and post openings internally and externally. Bond said the intent is to prevent the same coaches from "riding it out year after year." Several directors and the superintendent pushed back, saying annual reapplication could create subjectivity and discourage candidates.
"An evaluation is absolutely necessary at the end of each year," Director Krystal Pike said, arguing that a consistent evaluation process would provide grounds for removal if performance is below standard. Superintendent Trip Goodall cautioned that a requirement to reapply annually "would be the only policy of its kind in Oregon" and could draw scrutiny or be a barrier to applicants. Directors discussed potential conflicts when athletic directors supervise coaches who are parents of students and asked for a standard evaluation practice or committee approach. The board directed members to draft suggestions and agreed to bring the policy back for further consideration at a future meeting.
