Task force previews heated debate over RM-70 height ordinance and developer density

Task force members discussed a text amendment to the village code that would change height allowances in RM-70 districts and noted the amendment will require two readings by the commission. Rachel McQueen (S3) explained why the change is being handled as an ordinance rather than a variance: the commission removed a subjective variance from the code so height changes now need text amendments or demonstration of a hardship for a variance. "Variances typically are based on a hardship ... but until 2 years ago, we also have this 2nd, very subjective variance," she said, explaining why staff and commissioners favored removing that path.

Members also discussed how the village previously auctioned density units to raise money for public facilities and that developers (including Related) bought most units; the ordinance contains a 3.5-acre accumulation requirement to qualify. Concerns were raised about how assembling multiple parcels could allow taller towers on East and West Treasure Drive and Harbor Island. The group agreed to encourage public comment and to revisit the ordinance at the commission's December meeting for a first reading.