Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors raised fire-risk concerns; police recommend cameras for potential EV charger site
Summary
At town meeting opponents raised fears about fire risk from EV chargers and the police chief requested security cameras because of vandalism concerns; committee flagged camera costs as a select-board decision and discussed lower-cost options.
Get email alerts on the Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The minutes record vocal opposition at town meeting to the EV charger warrant article centered on fears about fire risks. The committee described the opposition as "primarily fear-based" and noted those concerns as part of the public reaction to the proposal.
Separately, the police chief raised vandalism concerns and requested security cameras for the town parking lot; the committee noted that camera costs should not be the responsibility of the EV project and that the select board must decide who pays. The minutes mention lower-cost consumer camera options (about $100/year) and battery-charged units as possible interim measures.
