Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff outlines five-year capital prioritization; state street allocation up $17,000
Summary
Staff described a priority-ranking approach for five-year capital planning (1=critical, 2=useful, 3=new capability) and noted an unexpected $17,000 increase in the state's street allocation to the city.
Get email alerts on the Capital Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A staff member said the city is using a priority-ranking approach for five-year capital planning, with items rated 1 (critical), 2 (useful), and 3 (new capability). They suggested that if the city has spending room—using a threshold example of $70,000—the council could accelerate a Year 3 item to Year 1 to address capital needs sooner.
The staff member also told the council that the street allocation from the state is about $17,000 higher than anticipated, which creates some breathing room for capital or maintenance projects. “The good news story here overall is that our street allocation from the state is up $17,000 from what we anticipated,” the staff member said.
Staff said they will update capital planning annually and roll forward priorities as funding and opportunities allow, advising the council on changes in timing when items are accelerated or deferred.
