Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Trial Scheduling topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Forensic delays push jury scheduling in Nanjalique Duran case; court sets August 10 status date
Summary
The state moved for a continuance in State v. Nanjalique Duran because forensic reports were not yet available; the court set a planning date for August 10 and discussed earliest possible jury selection after lab results are filed.
The court addressed a prosecutorial motion for continuance in the case against Nanjalique Duran after the state said forensic testing would not be complete in time for scheduled trial dates. The judge noted a lack of available jurors late in the day and scheduled the matter for further action on August 10 so parties can coordinate once lab results arrive.
Prosecutors said key forensic testing will not be back until August 4 and an officer will not be available until later that week; defense and the court agreed the earliest feasible trial planning would be after those dates. The court directed counsel and clerk (Norma) to place a new jury-selection date on the calendar after the lab results become available.
