Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Employee Benefits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Durham County adopts benefit redesign that preserves a $0-payroll base plan but raises deductibles to curb projected costs
Summary
County benefits consultants told commissioners the self-funded health plan faced an 18.8% claims-driven renewal that was reduced to an 8% budget target through plan design changes; the $0-contribution base plan remains but the base annual deductible rises from $750 to $2,250 and out-of-pocket maximums increase.
Get email alerts on the Employee Benefits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Human Resources Director Cathy Everett Perry and benefits consultant Alex Doberstein presented a county employee benefits update describing an 18.8% projected increase in claims that, after a combination of stop-loss and plan-design changes, the county reduced to an 8% budget target for the renewal period. The county kept a $0-payroll-contribution base plan to preserve affordability for employees while changing benefit design to reduce the county cost exposure.
Under the adopted design, the base (no-payroll) plan moved from a $750 annual deductible to a $2,250 annual deductible with an out-of-pocket maximum of $4,500; employees may pay payroll contributions to buy up to a richer plan (e.g., a $1,000 deductible buy-up with lower out-of-pocket exposure). Doberstein said the changes were intended to avoid cutting covered services or narrowing provider networks while bringing the renewal cost into an acceptable budget range. "We wanted to maintain a plan that for employee only they don't pay anything out of their paychecks," he said, adding that the tradeoff was higher out-of-pocket costs for members who use major services.
Commissioners pressed staff for concrete counts and distributional impacts: how many Durham County employees would see net pay decreases after the changes, and whether lower-paid workers or those with chronic conditions would be disproportionately affected. Perry and staff said they would compile and share payroll-impact data and highlighted steps already taken to protect particular groups (for example, grandfathering pre-65 retirees on the buy-up plan). The board directed staff to provide a breakdown of affected employees and to consider transition assistance options for lower-paid staff during upcoming budget deliberations.
