Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Notus council raises traffic, noise and hours concerns in response to Canyon County CUP for Arrowhead Springs
Summary
Notus council voted to send a formal response to Canyon County opposing elements of the Arrowhead Springs conditional-use permit (CU-2024-0024), citing worries about 24-hour operations, a requested 20-year extension, increased truck traffic and speed-zone impacts.
Notus City Council voted May 19 to send a formal response to Canyon County about conditional-use permit CU-2024-0024 for Arrowhead Springs, following a recommendation from the city’s Planning & Zoning Commission.
P&Z Chair Chris Grooms told the council the commission "have concerns of the extended hours of operation, and suggest a speed up lane be addressed, and move 45MPH zone further west to accommodate." Council members said they saw no clear reason for round-the-clock operations and expressed concern about noise and additional truck traffic along local roads. Councilman Rob Hartsock moved to transmit the P&Z concerns to Canyon County; Council President Steve Ahlborn seconded and the motion carried (Hartsock yes; Ahlborn yes; Conner yes).
The response formalizes the town’s objections to the permit’s operating hours and the request for a 20-year extension. The council did not adopt an ordinance or impose local conditions; it directed staff to send the written comments to Canyon County as the town’s official position.
