Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the PUD topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Developers present revisions to Broad Street PUD; council keeps some denials and asks about utilities undergrounding

Chamblee City Council · December 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Developers updated the council on revisions to the Broad Street PUD; staff reversed recommendations on several variances after receiving technical material, developers proposed architectural strategies for facades and rooflines and offered $204,000 toward burying overhead utilities while flagging execution complexity.

Staff told council that after receiving additional materials from the applicant the department changed its position on several previously denied variance requests for the Broad Street project (3525 Broad Street), and now recommends approval of a number of variances while retaining recommendations of denial for others that would undermine streetscape or safety objectives.

Architects for the applicant (Josh Sachs and an associate) presented design rationale: breaking larger masses into two volumes, varying window types between ground and upper floors, and selecting materials intended to preserve a pedestrian-scaled storefront experience. For Building 300 the team proposed an asymmetrical gable roof to activate a rooftop terrace and town green. On construction-type waivers the applicant sought permission for Type 3/5 (wood-based) construction, arguing state codes permit such construction and construction costs or feasibility would preclude concrete/steel alternatives.

On burying overhead utilities along Urbandale Drive, the applicant offered a $204,000 contribution but raised concerns about coordinating with utility providers and federal processes, asking for Chamblee’s assistance executing the work and some flexibility so permitting or occupancy would not be delayed. Council members pressed on timelines, fire access radii and how residential vs. retail parking will be separated in the garage; staff and the developer discussed phased or flexible approaches. No final votes were recorded at the work session.