Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hears debate over flight-school parking plan and tradeoffs for safety and permeability
Summary
Staff recommended approval of two variances and one waiver for a proposed parking lot to serve a flight school at 1974 and 1985 5th Street, and denial of two additional variances and one waiver; applicant and neighbors discussed safety, permeable pavers, ADA access and curb/bumper concerns.
Get email alerts on the Parking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff presented a multi-part request for the properties at 1974 and 1985 5th Street that would allow a new surface parking lot to support an existing flight school. The petition included four variances (location of parking between buildings and the street; use of permeable pavers; removal of marked parking spaces; removal of wheel bumpers) and two waivers (removing landscape islands and the five-foot pedestrian walkway). Staff recommended approving variances 1 and 2 and waiver 1, and denying variances 3 and 4 and waiver 2.
Applicant representative Darren Cussman Romo said the design favors pervious pavers to reduce impervious surface and help stormwater management. Romo argued that wheel bumpers and bolt-down devices are incompatible with permeable paver surfaces and would cause maintenance issues: "when you're applying to pavers, it doesn't really have anything to bind to... it just becomes an ongoing maintenance and safety issue and trip hazard in and of itself." A neighborhood resident raised concerns about cars parked on the street obstructing emergency vehicle access; another commenter urged that, if the council approves the plan, conditions be used to prevent on-street parking problems.
Staff included several conditions if variances are approved, such as pedestrian walkways tied to the site plan and a parcel consolidation requirement if required by DeKalb County. Council members asked for flexibility on boundary-tree impacts and the ability for staff to resolve off-site issues. The work session did not record a final vote; the item was scheduled for final action at a later meeting.
