Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Academic Goals topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Academics team outlines board goals and urges 'leveling up' after mixed STAR results

Cedar Hill ISD Board of Trustees · June 22, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Cedar Hill ISD staff presented board goals for reading and math through 2030, reported mixed early STAR/NWEA results, and said the district will shift targets and interventions to accelerate student growth rather than rely solely on growth scores.

Cedar Hill ISD staff presented the board's academic progress measures and acknowledged district assessment results leave work to do. Presenter Brian told the board the district's primary aim will be “leveling up” students so each scholar advances at least one performance level on interim measures, then outlined targets — for example, increasing third‑grade STAR 'meets and above' toward a 46% target by August 2030.

Brian noted early STAR estimates showed the district fell short of the 2026 target and recommended adjusting short‑term targets: "we now have to be moving our target towards '27 of an increase of 5%." He contrasted MAP/NWEA growth, which appeared average, with STAR outcomes that did not yet reflect that growth for lower‑performing students and said the district must accelerate growth beyond one year of progress.

Trustees pressed for detail on campus‑level performance and subgroup results; one trustee said the presentation made sense and helped explain differences across student groups. Another trustee replied that while growth exists, “the student didn't grow” to the level required by STAR, underscoring the board's concern that year‑to‑year growth may not be sufficient to move low performers into grade‑level proficiency.

Staff said the presentation included district MAP and early STAR data and emphasized the district will set campus‑specific targets and teacher‑level strategies to raise overall outcomes. The presentation set the stage for later conversations about interventions, instructional coaching and schedule changes that staff say are needed to meet board goals.