Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Lease ILEAD topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Subcommittee reviews proposed iLEAD lease with 8% LCFF-based rent cap, flags maintenance timelines
Summary
A Facilities & Finance subcommittee reviewed a draft lease with iLEAD that would run July 1–June 30, 2032, propose an 8% LCFF-based rent cap, and shift detailed maintenance duties to the charter; members asked for clarifications on ownership of exterior fixtures, repair deadlines, and options for shorter, renewable terms.
The Acton-Agua Dulce Unified School District facilities and finance subcommittee reviewed a draft lease proposed for the iLEAD charter campus, including a rent formula tied to LCFF revenue and detailed maintenance obligations.
Committee member presented the draft and said the lease’s effective date would be July 1 and run through 06/30/2032 if approved by the board. The presenter summarized the rent proposal and the district's rationale: “What is being proposed, through this lease, is a predictable rent formula, is what has been proposed at 8% of the prior, the prior fiscal LCFF funding,” and noted the draft caps that percentage rather than applying progressive increases.
The presenter explained the maintenance allocation and response-time expectations: “1 to 3 days for critical well system issues, basically, septic tank,” and listed additional timelines for fire alarms (5 days), roof work (10 days) and standard repairs (30 days). Committee members said the new language replaces broader maintenance clauses with more measurable responsibilities and provides district protections such as Prop 39 facility claims during the lease term.
Members pressed staff for clarifications the lease should include. One committee member asked whether exterior concrete, lunch tables and benches were explicitly included in the new agreement and whether items installed by the charter could be removed if the charter left the site. Committee members also questioned a change from “prior written approval” to a shorter prior-approval phrasing and asked staff to preserve clear documentation requirements.
On lease length and rent basis, members differed: the chair recommended a shorter, renewable arrangement citing uncertain future needs tied to housing and enrollment, while another member recommended disconnecting rent from LCFF and charging a market rate with a 3–5% annual escalator. The committee asked staff to return with clarified language on major-repair responsibilities (roof and structural replacements), indemnity language, and potential month-to-month or annual cancellation options.
Next steps: staff will incorporate the requested clarifications, confirm which infrastructure items remain district responsibilities, and bring a revised lease package to the board with a side-by-side comparison of current and proposed terms.
