Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Transportation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

District staff recommends leasing four buses after cost and maintenance review

Acton-Agua Dulce Unified Facility Finance Subcommittee · January 21, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff told the Facility Finance Subcommittee that leasing four 76‑passenger buses would cost about $212,954 annually and could save money over buying used buses, which the presentation priced between $142,900 and $240,000 each. Staff will return with lease-mileage details at the February meeting.

District transportation staff presented a cost comparison on Jan. 20 and recommended leasing four 76‑passenger buses rather than purchasing used vehicles.

“So right here, we have basically, an option of leasing 4 buses for 76 passengers,” the presenter said, and later summarized the recommendation: “Basically, recommendation of the district would be leasing versus purchasing. We will save a lot of money going on that route.” The presentation listed an annual lease figure of about $212,954 for the four vehicles and used-bus price ranges from roughly $142,900 to $240,000 each. Staff also said expected maintenance costs are lower under lease arrangements (the presenter cited maintenance ranges of about $20,000–$28,000 for leased buses versus $55,000–$74,000 for used buses, depending on condition).

Board members pressed for details about mileage-overage fees and warranty coverage. Staff said typical district routes average 15,000–20,000 miles and that the lease on the table is five years with an initial bumper-to-bumper period discussed in the presentation. Aboard member asked for specific overage charges and other fine-print contract terms; staff said they will obtain those items and bring a fuller recommendation to the February board meeting.

No formal motion or vote was recorded during the subcommittee meeting; staff characterized the session as a direction to return with additional cost and contract details.