Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Health Insurance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners told private health plan could cut first‑year cost by about $147,000 but carries long‑term risk
Summary
Staff presented a private-market alternative to the county’s TAC health insurance pool that could "potentially save us this 1st year about a $147,000," but staff warned carriers would not bid on Trinity County and the county could lose its grandfathered status and long‑term stability if it left the TAC pool.
A county presenter (S7) reviewed the employee health insurance renewal and said staff sought private‑market bids. S7 said major carriers declined to underwrite Trinity County and that the single private option returned by a broker "could potentially save us this 1st year about a $147,000," but cautioned that the plan is not an apples‑to‑apples comparison with the county’s current TAC coverage.
S7 recommended staying with the TAC pool because the county is currently "grandfathered" and pays less than many neighboring counties, and because private‑market rates have shown volatility. S7 cited other counties seeing negotiated reductions to 17% from prior 21% increases, but warned a private switch could expose the county to higher future increases. Commissioners raised questions about the county’s higher per‑employee claims mix and whether retirement or sheriff‑related claims affected rates; staff said the claims mix (higher claims per employee) is a key driver of Trinity County’s elevated costs.
There was no final policy decision in the meeting; the presenter urged caution and recommended remaining with TAC pending further analysis. Commissioners asked staff to continue exploring options with attention to long‑term rate risk and to bring more detailed comparisons to a future meeting.
