Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sussex County commissioners adopt resolutions on MVC registration review and local stance on federal immigration enforcement
Summary
The Sussex County Board of Commissioners voted unanimously on July 29 to adopt two resolutions: one requesting further review of a Motor Vehicle Commission registration error and another expressing support for limited local cooperation with federal immigration enforcement; the votes were recorded by roll call.
The Sussex County Board of Commissioners adopted two resolutions during a special meeting on July 29, 2026: one asking for additional review and oversight related to a Motor Vehicle Commission (MVC) software error and another addressing the county's position on cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. The board recorded yes votes on both resolutions during a roll call.
Director Space called the meeting to order and opened the floor for public comment before commissioners moved to adopt the two resolutions. A motion to adopt both "resolutions A and B" was made and seconded; the clerk then called the roll. The minutes record recorded affirmative votes for Commissioner Carney, Deputy Director DeGroot, Commissioner Henderson, Commissioner Silverthorn and Director Space. The board adjourned at 8:24 p.m.
Public comment at the meeting focused heavily on the two measures. Opponents called the items symbolic and urged the board to focus county resources on concrete local needs such as infrastructure and services, while supporters urged stronger oversight of voter rolls and clearer local policy on law-enforcement cooperation with federal agencies. As Tracy Richardson of the League of Women Voters put it, "Earlier this month ... governor Sherrill publicly disclosed that a software error at the motor vehicle commission caused approximately 6,600 people who indicated that they are not citizens to be registered to vote." Richardson also noted the Division of Elections had removed more than 4,500 registrations identified as part of the error and that fewer than 400 of the affected registrations appear to have resulted in votes.
The resolutions themselves do not change state law; several public speakers and local organizations urged that state-level investigations and audits already under way be allowed to proceed. The board did not specify additional county-funded investigations at the meeting; minutes and roll call indicate the board's action was the adoption of the two resolutions.
