Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Judicial Vacancies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances bill to let parties nominate candidates for late multi‑county judicial vacancies
Summary
House Bill 0458, a rewrite described as a cleanup to House Bill 855, would allow party executive committees to nominate candidates for multi-county judicial vacancies that occur after qualifying deadlines; the committee approved the amendment and moved the bill to calendar and rules.
Get email alerts on the Judicial Vacancies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The State Local Government Committee on Feb. 4 approved a rewritten version of House Bill 0458 (by Rudd) designed to address late-occurring multi-county judicial vacancies and moved the bill to calendar and rules (21 ayes, 1 present not voting).
Chairman Moon described the legislation as "a cleanup to house bill 855, which was enacted last year," saying that because four judicial seats became vacant after qualifying deadlines there is currently no mechanism in some cases to fill those openings through the normal primary process. He said the amendment (11640) provides a "narrowly tailored solution by allowing the executive committees of the Republican Party and the Democratic Party to nominate their respective candidates for a general election when the judicial vacancy occurred after the qualifying deadline." The committee voted 19–0 to place the amendment on the bill and later approved the bill 21 ayes, 1 present not voting.
The committee recessed to hear testimony from Scott Golden of the Tennessee Republican Party, who described the problem for multi-county judicial seats that miss the call-to-primary deadline (he cited Aug. 25 as the relevant filing deadline) and said the bill is intended as a limited fix so voters still have access to a full and competitive general-election ballot. Members asked whether the measure applies only to judicial offices; Chairman Moon clarified it applies to judicial vacancies and that statutory carve-outs cover non-judicial offices.
With the committee’s approval the bill proceeds to the chamber calendar; the committee did not set a date for further floor action.
