Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Old Library Developer topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tompkins County Legislature deadlocks 6–6 on preferred developer for old library site
Summary
After hours of public comment and extended debate over housing density, historic preservation and Lifelong’s future, the Legislature failed to name a preferred developer for the old county library, leaving the decision to return to committee.
Tompkins County legislators failed to agree on a preferred developer for the county-owned old library site on a 6–6 roll-call vote after an evening that featured more than an hour of public comment and lengthy chamber debate.
The old library committee had recommended Travis Hyde Properties as the preferred developer by a 3–2 committee vote, and a motion to adopt that committee recommendation was the main resolution on the floor. After a series of amendments and a failed substitute motion to name Franklin/Stream as the preferred developer, the roll call resulted in six yes votes and six no votes, so the resolution did not carry. Clerk roll call shows a recorded 6 ayes and 6 noes; Chair Michael Lane announced the matter would return to committee for further work.
Members framed the decision around competing priorities. Supporters of the Travis Hyde recommendation argued the larger project would deliver more housing units downtown — a pressing need, legislators said — while backers of Franklin emphasized adaptive reuse, neighborhood scale and strong public support. "We can't throw away 38 units" was among the arguments used to press for a denser outcome; other legislators noted the unusual size and intensity of public input on both sides.
The vote followed a narrow, earlier decision by the Legislature to include language asking county negotiators to "attempt to secure a ground lease" rather than an outright sale of the parcel; that amendment survived a reconsideration vote. Legislators debated whether a long-term ground lease (50–99 years) would be workable for condo financing and for developer lenders, with developers saying lenders typically need a lease term that extends beyond loan maturities.
With no preferred developer named, the chair said the item will return to the old library committee for further negotiation and technical work, including potential follow-up with the developers and Lifelong, the local senior-services nonprofit whose needs figured heavily in the debate.
