Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Major Site Plan Presentation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears preliminary presentation for Main Street Living mixed‑use redevelopment
Summary
Main Street Living LLC presented a 5.7‑acre mixed‑use redevelopment project for the Town Center South redevelopment area: a three‑story mixed‑use building with retail and 10 residential units and 46 stacked townhomes, plus parking, stormwater basins and utilities; applicant agreed to address review comments as conditions.
Main Street Living LLC presented a preliminary and final site plan application for a 5.7‑acre redevelopment parcel in the Town Center South area at the Robbinsville Land Use Board meeting. Counsel described the proposal as a three‑story mixed‑use building with approximately 6,000 square feet of ground‑floor retail and 10 upper‑floor residential units, plus five buildings containing 46 stacked townhomes and supportive parking and infrastructure.
Engineer Jeff Haberman summarized the site plan: two new curb cuts on Main Street, four infiltration basins to meet stormwater requirements, an 8‑inch water main extension (pending Aqua New Jersey coordination), and either a pump station or future gravity sewer tie-in for sanitary service. Haberman testified the mixed‑use pad includes 55 parking stalls where 39 are required; the stacked townhomes require 109 stalls per RSIS and the project proposes 126. Haberman said the design keeps building coverage and impervious coverage within redevelopment plan allowances and that the proposal will comply with review comments as conditions of approval.
Architect Jack Raker presented unit plans and elevations (contemporary/modern‑farmhouse vocabulary), describing 2‑ and 3‑bedroom stacked townhouse units, interior garage access and material selections (fiber cement siding, full brick veneer, metal accents). He said most mechanicals would be screened and that common areas (dog run, bike racks, landscaping) would be maintained by an HOA or association. Board professionals asked clarifying questions about building separations, covered entryways and screening; the applicant agreed to submit revised plans addressing those comments.
The application generated technical questions but no immediate decision; the board set follow‑ups and scheduled continued review. Applicant representatives said they would revise plans to reflect staff and board comments, supply additional screening and adjust pad and parking details as needed.
