Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facilities Roofing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Presenter recommends full roof replacement; committee weighs warranty trade-offs and remaining budget
Summary
Staff recommended replacing roofs on two campus buildings after comparing bids and warranty coverage. The subcommittee discussed 10-year versus 20-year warranties and noted the board previously approved $480,000 for roofing; staff reported remaining funds of roughly $195,846 toward the project.
S3 presented roofing quotes and recommended replacing the roof rather than a partial repair. S3 explained comparative bids and warranty trade-offs and concluded full replacement better addressed recurring failures: “my recommendation would be basically replacing the whole thing.”
Committee members noted warranty differences: a 10-year warranty was described as covering labor and materials while a longer, 20-year figure covered materials only. The board previously approved a $480,000 roofing budget; S3 reported current project spending of about $284,000 and an estimated remaining balance near $195,846. The subcommittee asked staff to check hardscape proposals and consider whether savings could support related site projects (for example, playground hardscape at High Desert).
Next steps: staff will confirm final bids, warranty details and potential hardscape proposals and return a recommendation to the subcommittee and then the board.
