Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission weighs family‑division options, limits on relatives and affidavits suggested
Summary
The commission reviewed three family‑division options (1‑acre residual, 5‑acre residual, hybrid grandfathering) and discussed whether to include nieces/nephews/ aunts/uncles; staff suggested using an affidavit for narrow exceptions rather than adding broad family definitions.
Get email alerts on the Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff presented three options for family divisions: keep the current 1‑acre residual, require a 5‑acre residual, or adopt a hybrid that grandfathered existing owners but required larger residuals after an ordinance effective date. Staff warned that raising a minimum to 10 acres would likely increase family‑division applications.
Commissioners debated whether to broaden the definition of family to include nieces, nephews, aunts and uncles. A planning staff member recommended using an affidavit for narrow administrative exceptions to avoid imposing genealogical review responsibilities on county staff: "an affidavit is a legally binding document...that places the administrative burden on the individual instead of placing more work on us to, like, do a genealogy report." No change was adopted; staff will draft language for advertisement.
