Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Fund topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council weighs ‘hunker down’ approach vs. bonding to fix aging water system
Summary
City staff and consultants presented water-fund cash-flow scenarios and department heads recommended trimming contracts and delaying projects rather than issuing a long-term bond; council asked staff to provide sharper cost and bond-service analyses for a future presentation.
Council members discussed options to address an aging water system after staff and a consultant reviewed cash-flow scenarios. S4 summarized the approach discussed with department heads and Zions, saying they preferred to "kind of hunker down, tighten our belt, let's not go bond." Councilors voiced concern that delaying projects could increase construction costs but also noted that a large bond would lock the city into long-term debt service.
Staff asked for direction to refine analyses: department heads will present targeted project-cost estimates and Zions (Jonathan Ward, referenced) was asked to provide further bonding scenarios that compare inflation in construction costs with interest and debt-service implications. Council agreed to have John (department head) and Jonathan return with updated numbers and trade-off analysis.
