Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

CDC recommends single, raised 4-post shade structure at DoubleTree Ranch Park (6–1)

Highlands City Council · January 12, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After debate over costs, maintenance and long-term tree planting, the CDC recommended the single 4-post shade structure covering the chessboard area and asked parks staff to pursue funding and add trees later; the motion passed 6–1.

Parks staff presented six options to address the failing shade structure at DoubleTree Ranch Park, ranging from re-installing a full engineered shade to removing the structure entirely and planting trees. Staff presented cost estimates that included a full 4-post engineered shade (roughly $60,000–$62,000 including demo and turf repair), four 20x20 cantilever shades (slide figures varied but were presented near $60,795–$64,008), and tree-only or full-demo alternatives ranging from about $12,761 to $41,008 depending on tree caliper and demo scope.

Board members debated whether to prioritize immediate, low-maintenance structured shade or a longer-term natural approach with trees. Several members, citing frequent playground and splash-pad adjacency and year-round program use, argued for preserving structured shade; others favored a hybrid plan of partial structure plus plantings. After discussion, a motion was made to recommend option 1 (the single engineered 4-post shade to cover the chessboard). The motion was seconded and passed on a 6–1 vote; members also recommended parks staff consider planting additional trees using the annual tree-planting budget and to explore pavilion rental programming and maintenance implications. "Trees are great, but they don't solve everything in this case," one member said during debate; another urged preserving the structured shade as a usable, programmatic amenity.